Category Archives: OPINION

The following opinions necessarily reflect the biases, experiences and narrow views of the author.

music subscription services way of future, ISPs should be sharing their windfall profits

 Music industry is getting no where with illegal downloads: U2 manager

http://news.therecord.com/arts/NightLife/article/779503

As far as solving the music industry’s financial woes, U2 manager Paul McGuinness still hasn’t found what he’s looking for. But he’s not about to stop beating the drum.

McGuinness writes a lengthy piece in the new issue of Rolling Stone addressing the file-sharing and piracy issues that he believes are largely the source of the meltdown of the music business in recent years. It’s an update and expansion on ideas he put forth at the international MIDEM music conference in Cannes two years ago, an event at which I spoke with him at length about some very specific recommendations on how to address those issues.

Now, as then, he holds Internet service providers — and the giant telecommunications corporations that control the vast majority of ISPs — responsible, arguing that they’ve built their industry to a large extent by providing free content, often irrespective of the intellectual property rights of musicians and other creative types responsible for that content.

When I sat down with him in Cannes, he noted that ISPs have no qualms about promptly shutting down the accounts of users who don’t pay their ISP bills; they should do the same for those who illegally share copyrighted Web content like music.

More than two years later, he writes in Rolling Stone’s Sept. 30 issue that’s just out, little has changed in that regard.

“For the world’s Internet Service Providers, bloated by years of broadband growth, ‘free music’ has been a multi-billion dollar bonanza,” McGuinness writes. “Unfortunately, the main problem is still just as bad as it ever was.

“Artists cannot get record deals. Revenues are plummeting. Efforts to provide legal and viable ways of making money from muse are being stymied by piracy. The latest industry figures, from IFPI (the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry), show that 95 percent of all the music downloaded is illegally obtained and unpaid for. … A study endorsed by trade unions says Europe’s creative industries could lose more than a million jobs in the next five years.

“Finally,” he adds, “maybe the message is getting through that this isn’t just about fewer limos for rich rock stars.”

Many of those rock stars have been reluctant to go on the offensive, because the problem is often cast in precisely those terms: millionaire musicians whining that they aren’t making even more money.

McGuinness still thinks, as he did back in early 2008, that music subscription services should be the way of the future and that ISPs should be sharing their windfall profits with the artists and labels that have helped them pull in that money. If they don’t do so voluntarily, government intervention should be the next step. He points to laws passed in France, England, South Korea, Taiwan and New Zealand aimed at tipping the scales back toward equity for musicians. But that still leaves much of the world without any such protections.

“I think we are coming to understand that ‘free’ comes with a price,” McGuinness writes, “and in my business that means less investment in talent, and fewer artists making a living from music.”

The $64-billion question is: How many musicians, managers, record company executives or even ISP bigwigs will be willing to get behind McGuinness?

CBC (including radio) to stay the course

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/television/john-doyle/the-post-stursberg-cbc-tilt-goes-the-tightrope/article1671986/

“Stursberg’s CBC is ratings-driven, populist, pop-culture-obsessed in its news coverage, lightweight, disdainful of the arts and mortally afraid of appearing highbrow.”

“…anyone who thinks that Stursberg’s departure means a reversal of his various TV and radio implementations is kidding him- or herself. The five-year plan has more to do with capital spending, hardware and financial management systems than it has to do with dramas and sitcom on TV or the genre of music played on CBC radio channels. Things are not going backward. If you worship at the altar of the old CBC of Peter Gzowski and Barbara Frum, you are not going home again. We’ll all be living with Stursberg’s CBC for a long time to come.”

Music fees in US being reviewed, someday (soon?) maybe in Canada

The fees paid by Yahoo Inc. and RealNetworks Inc. for licences to play music on the Internet should be recalculated, a U.S. appeals court ruled Tuesday in the first case over music usage involving so-called new media.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/us-court-orders-music-download-licence-fee-review/article1732614/

Apple In Talks On Subscription Service: Report

“Apple is in talks with major record labels to provide a subscription-based music service, allowing unlimited access to songs for a monthly fee, the New York Post said, citing unnamed sources.”

http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i22ebc6f33ed6ca2eb68d2304bd3d8614

Apple is in talks with major record labels to provide a subscription-based music service, allowing unlimited access to songs for a monthly fee, the New York Post said, citing unnamed sources.

This will be the defining, game-changing moment for the recording industry.  Apple will continue be the dominate retailer of music for the forseeable future.  But, there will be room for niche players.

To compete with Apple, you have to start “free”

Bob Lefsetz argues that in order to create competition for Apple’s iTunes, music providers must initially allow their content to be provided to a start up such as Spotify for free.

Apple has too strong a “default” hold, and this will only be strengthened by its new Ping service and whatever streaming service they announce in the future.

http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/2010/09/02/applestreamingsubscription/

Music labels eager for Google-Apple battle

Google mulling download store, song locker service; talks with labels led by Android founder Rubin

 

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/music-labels-eager-for-google-apple-battle/article1694271/

Copyright debate turns ugly…

Heritage Minister James Moore ignited a wasp’s nest of angry responses when he labelled those oposed to copyright reform “radical extremists”.  Most of the response comes from those who do not wish to be hindered in how they choose to use digital media they have purchased.

However, no one seems to have an alternate solution for how the creators of digital media can be ensured that they get compensated for creating.  Everyone wants unfettered access to what is created, and unfortunately in this day and age, piracy has pretty much killed my ability to make a living creating music.

Digital locks will not prevent this, but what other model is there that today’s consumer would support that would ensure that I can get paid for what I produce?

Should I work at Tim Horton’s, and in my spare time, produce music for everyone to have access to for free?

Worldwide revenues from recorded music drops from 40 to 17 billion in last decade.

David Pakman, former CEO of eMusic, and now a venture capitalist, in an interview with Philip Leigh:

“David believes that the recorded music business has reached yet another mutation point. Over the past decade worldwide revenues dropped from $40 billion to about $17 billion.  Furthermore, unless the industry begins to proceed along a new evolutionary path he predicts the declines will continue for another five years before bottoming-out at perhaps $7 billion.”

http://insidedigitalmedia.com/musics-next-evolution/

Facebook and Music: a new dictatorship?

http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i7278144fcfbad6f73672263fc7a7657b

“the key to the digital music future is a service that can do the best job of not only delivering the music that users want to hear, but to introduce users to new music that they don’t know they like yet, and monetize the entire process. To do that, services need to know what kind of music you like in order to recommend other things you may also like.”

“Facebook’s Open Graph has the opportunity to provide this level of insight.” 

 “The music industry knows all too well what happens when a partner has too much power. Look at iTunes.”

Streaming services sees preference for mobile streaming

Streaming services such as Spotify who are trying to determine where they can make the most money from their service are seeing a higher demand for “multi-platform” access, which includes smartphones, for which they can charge a paid “premium” rate, as opposed to the free access “freemium” rate.

“Take multi-platform access, such as how Spotify makes users who want mobile access via their smartphone apps pay. Kumaran said users paying for multi-platform access use the service on average three times more than as those who don’t.”

@Web 2.0 Expo: Web Community Discusses Freemium Model
http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3ia9f1b586d315106411f76cc7380b4e67